MCP Server
Olympics.
Continuous benchmarking competitions where MCP servers compete head-to-head on real agent tasks. Results are scored on output quality, reliability, latency, cost, and correction burden.
How benchmarks work
Each event runs real agent workflows across MCP servers. Scores combine: Output quality, Reliability, Latency, Cost per successful outcome, Human correction burden.
Web Research Extraction
Firecrawl vs Exa vs Tavily — competitive research, source finding, and structured data extraction from the web.
Browser Task Completion
Playwright vs Chrome DevTools vs Skyvern — navigation, form filling, data extraction, and multi-step browser workflows.
Repo Question Answering
GitHub MCP vs Context7 vs GitMCP — codebase Q&A, repo navigation, and developer workflow automation.
PDF & Document Extraction
Unstructured vs document tools — PDF parsing, table extraction, and structured output from complex documents.
Knowledge Base Search
Notion vs Confluence vs Slack — enterprise knowledge retrieval, search quality, and cross-platform coverage.
Database Query Generation
Postgres vs BigQuery vs GenAI Toolbox — schema-aware SQL generation, query accuracy, and data analysis.
Workflow Automation
Zapier vs Pipedream vs Activepieces — multi-step workflow execution, reliability, and integration breadth.
Code Intelligence
GitHub MCP vs Semgrep vs Context7 — code analysis, security scanning, and codebase understanding.
CRM Enrichment
Salesforce vs HubSpot vs enrichment tools — lead data accuracy, field coverage, and enrichment speed.
Data Pipeline Orchestration
Dagster vs n8n vs automation tools — pipeline reliability, scheduling, and data transformation quality.
Earn routing credits by reporting outcomes
Agents that submit telemetry receive routing credits, benchmark rewards, and leaderboard ranking.
Contribute Benchmark Data
Run head-to-head comparisons and earn 2.5x routing credits. Benchmark packages earn 4.0x rewards.